© Aug. 30, 2008

Revised:  Feb1, 2009

 

 




 

 


THE PROPHECIES

OF

Daniel

 

 

James L. Merrills, M. Div.

 

 

     Why study the book of Daniel? First, Daniel sweeps the course of history. God’s fulfilled word leads us to trust in Him. Second, Jesus told us to read it with understanding (Matt. 24:15). Every Christian will desire to follow Jesus’ commandments. Third, Daniel’s prophecies are concerned with the time-of-the-end. According to the New Testament and Revelation, we are now living at the end of time.

     Like many Old Testament books, the entire book of Daniel is structured on an “X” pattern (called a “chiasm,” for the Greek letter chi-X). The central theme is found at the middle—judgment. (Daniel’s name means “My judge is God.”) This mirror-like structure pairs the book’s stories and visions.

·        Ch 2/7 – 4 earthly kingdoms

·        Ch 3/6 – The Hebrew’s trials

·        Ch 4/5 – Proud kings are judged

·        Ch 7 – The “heart” of Daniel:  JUDGMENT of earthly powers

·        Ch 7/12 – Judgment: books opened, Christ’s 2nd Coming

·        Ch 8/11 – War: East & West, the sanctuary

·        Ch 9/10 – Prayer, vision

In fact, almost every chapter is written in a chi formation (or A / B / A’ pattern).

     As the language reveals, Daniel’s prophecies were written for both the Israelites and the Babylonians. Chapters 1, 8-12 are written in Hebrew, and contain important messages specifically for God’s people. Chapters 2-7 are written in Aramaic, the language of Babylon. Failing to realize that Daniel contains stories and information designed to reach and teach the Gentiles about the true God in heaven, contemporary scholars have sought to discredit the prophet Daniel as the author of this inspired work. But Jesus tells us otherwise (Matt. 24:15).

     But Daniel is more than just a book about history. Daniel uses the word “end” over 30 times, and two-thirds of the book is devoted to the time of the end!

     Join me now as we examine this amazing book together!

 

James L. Merrills, M. Div.

 

________________________

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel

 

 

DANIEL 1

 

Chapter one is the history of Babylon sacking Jerusalem, and how God’s people overcome and are preserved!

 

     Chapter one begins with God handing over Israel—and her glorious sanctuary—to Babylon, because of her covenant unfaithfulness. To the undiscerning eye, Mount Babel, the city that personifies evil, has overthrown Mount Zion, the city of God!

     After marching across the desert to the land of the Chaldeans* (605 B.C.), Daniel—a mere teenager—and his three friends are among the chosen Hebrews selected to work in the service of the Babylonian king. The opening story contains religious overtones (i.e., “no blemish,” “not defile”), which is consistent with the book’s emphasis on the sanctuary. Babylon’s usurpation is seen on the personal level, exchanging their Godly Hebrew names with names that honor the false gods. Even the diet is more than just food; this is akin to a pagan communion! Similar to the heart of Revelation (chapter 13), the real issue here is worship of the Creator.** (The initial test for Adam and Christ was over diet.)

     At the outset of their captivity, the remnant of Israel—four Hebrew boys—are “proved” and triumphant! After being tested for “ten days” they are found to be “ten times better” than the magicians, wisest men in the realm! (The number “10” is a measure of testing: 10 Commandments, 10-percent tithe, 10 plagues, etc.)***

     This is only the first chapter in Daniel’s Babylonian career. God will reward him with further “understanding in all visions and dreams,” preserving his life until the end of the 70-year captivity, as prophesied (Jer. 29:10). But the book of Daniel reveals that while God is in control of history, it is purposely moving us toward the end. The mention of Cyrus’ name points us to the end, when the Israelites will return to Jerusalem. The “end” is a primary theme that permeates the entire book, culminating in the resurrection of the saints at the end (Dan. 12:1-4, 9). 

-------------------------

* The name “Chaldean” (kaldu) is associated with magician or astrologer. The word “magician” (cheret) literally means “to cut” or “engrave.” The magicians were closely associated with the “astrologers,” who drew (or “cut”) lines and circles for horoscopes. They also cut animals open to “read” the innards and divine the future.

** Daniel’s menu is a “literal quotation from the text [Gen. 1:29] of Creation” (Doukhan). The Hebrew eye recognizes many allusions in Daniel to Creation. Of course, Creation is found at the heart of the law, which is at the heart of the Creator’s sanctuary. (An end-time appeal to worship the Creator is also found at the heart of Revelation; 14:7.)

*** The numbers 6 and 10 have early association with Babylon. We continue to use the Babylonian sexagesimal system today to measure time—“60” (6 x 10). It may be that the repeated use of “10” here—the Hebrews being 10 times better after 10 days of trial—is to make a point to the Babylonians. The numbers 3 (“trinity”), 4 (“the entire world” or all encompassing; Rev. 7:1), 7 (complete or perfect), and 12 (God’s kingdom number) are key in Bible prophecy.

--The city of Babylon, with its infamous hanging-gardens, was one of the seven wonders of the world.

--Daniel had “understanding” (bin; v.4),  which was also gifted him by God (v.17). This gift (bin) is highlighted in chapters 8 through 12.

 

 

 

DANIEL 2

 

God lays out the coming world powers, culminating with the establishment of His eternal kingdom.

 

     Chapters 2 through 7, which are written in Aramaic, the language of Babylon, contain stories that show how God intervened in the affairs of Babylon. Through these, God reaches out to the pagan people through supernatural events and Daniel’s records.

     Previously, the Hebrews were tested and prevailed. Now, Babylon’s wise men are put to the test, by their king, who has a dream and is troubled by it—there are hints here that suggest the king believes his life is on the line. Consequently, the king demands an interpretation without sharing the dream—if the wise men’s gods know anything, then they know everything! The wise men respond, “It would take a god above ours to reveal this”—that is, the God of heaven!

     Strangely, Daniel wasn’t called in; and yet His life is now on the line! So, he asks the king for time (not the dream), and then the four Hebrews turn to prayer. Upon receiving an answer to his prayer by vision, Daniel spends perhaps more time praising God as the source of all wisdom! He is indeed thankful and humble. We should not miss the fact that Daniels’ first task is to preserve the lives of his Babylonian counterparts.

     After explaining to the king that only the God of heaven could know the king’s dream, Daniel confidently states that the dream regarded an “image” or statue, made of metals that ranged from gold, at the head, to iron and clay, at the feet. Then a stone, broken off from a distant mountain, smashes the statue, and becomes a mountain-kingdom itself fills the entire earth.

     Convinced that Daniel’s God is all-knowing, the king listens to the interpretation. The “head”* of gold represents Babylon (605-539BC. The arms of silver (Medo-Persia; 538-331BC), the thighs of brass (Greece; 331-146BC), and the legs of iron (Rome; 146BC-476AD) are the world powers that would rise up after it (Commentary on the Old Testament, Keil & Delitzsch). The feet, of iron and clay, represent the multiplicity of kingdom-nations that exist after Rome’s fall, though Rome (the iron) actually continues to the end. The interpretation is mostly concerned with the “latter days” (verse 28, 41-45), when God will set up His eternal kingdom. According to the prophecy, we are living in the time of the end.

     The word tselem (“image”) means “to shade.” To the Hebrew eye, the king is likened here to Adam (verse 38), who was given dominion over the beasts, fowls and descendents. Unsatisfied, the king seeks to be like the Creator. Again in chapter 4 the king is depicted as a tree (4:12, 20-22), which provides shade and food for the birds, beasts and inhabitants of his kingdom (4:12, 20-22). Though Daniel informs him that God has granted him this kingdom (2:37), His pride and ultimate rejection of God’s supreme power comes through his statement “[Look what] I have built” (4:30). More specifically, the king desires to usurp Christ, the Creator (compare Eph. 3:9 and Rev 5:12-14). Like Christ, the “King of kings” (Rev. 19:16), the king is addressed as “king of kings” (2:37). Like Christ, the “head” (Col. 1:18), the king is seen here as the “head” of the image. And finally, the king’s dominion-shalat rivals that of the Son of Man (Dan 7:13, 14). 

     As the story ends, the king acknowledges the power of Daniel’s God, and then falls prostrate in worship before him, before promoting him, and his three companions, to the highest position in the kingdom. How is this behavior possible? In the king’s eyes, Daniels’s God is Marduk, the god of Babylon, called the “God of gods, and a Lord of kings” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marduk). The king has not been converted to the Creator God.

-------------------------

* “Head” (reesh) means “first” or “beginning.” This, combined with the king’s God-given “dominion” (v. 38) over beast and fowl, point back to Adam and Creation. Both represent the beginning of history.

Astrologers—the gods are detached from man; Daniel—God is connected to man, via prayer, dreams, visions 

Descending metals; clay foundation reflects weakness of image; clay is not metal, used to form man

How could only four world-powers—no more, no less—have been predicted, regardless of when scholars date Daniel?

Stone occupies most of the dream = Christ’s kingdom (Ps 118:22; Isa. 28:16)

The clay is unlike the other 4 elements that represent political kingdoms. A non-metal, it has a different nature. The “potter’s clay” in Scriptures alludes to a Creator; the clay has a religious nature, not political. Jewish commentators have interpreted the clay as Christianity, the state religion adopted by the (iron) Roman Empire.

Image/stone; temporary vs eternal

We are living in the time of the end.

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 3

 

King Nebuchadnezzar attempts to defy God’s prophetic word by building an image, but encounters the Son of God!

 

     Never content, Nebuchadnezzar sets out to show that his kingdom will last forever! So he builds an image, based on the one in his dream (Dan. 2). But now it’s all gold! The image is built in units of “6” (“sixty cubits high and six cubits wide,” NIV), the number associated with man (created on the sixth day), and Babylon.*

     After assembling “all the rulers” from every level of his kingdom, Nebuchadnezzar commands everyone—under the threat of death—to worship his image, when the band begins to play the music. This religion is intolerant and mechanical. His decree reflects his desperation to out-prove God’s prophetic word. Naturally, all bow down; all but three Hebrew men. Seizing the opportunity, the king’s servants accuse the “Jews” of violating the king’s decree by showing no regard for the king or his gods. (Though Daniel is absent on this occasion, he is faced with similar conditions in chapter 6.)

    Expecting that the Hebrews will reconsider their situation, the King asks “Who is that God who will deliver you from death”? Indeed, the Hebrews, nor their God, have been put to this test! But to the king’s surprise, they show no fear, even stating confidently “Be it known that our God could save us, but if not, we still will not bow to the image!” In reaction, the furnace is heated 7 times—to its fullest!—hotter (an act that is intended to usurp the Hebrew God). Then the Hebrews, still fully clothed, are cast-remah (Daniel is later cast-remah into the lion’s den) into a fiery furnace, which had probably been used to smelt the gold (or fire bricks). The fire is so hot that it immediately consumes the life of the furnace guards.

     Then, to the shock of all, four beings can be seen walking in the furnace! The fourth Daniel tells us was the Son-bar of God. (In chapter 7, Daniel sees the Son-bar standing in the heavenly judgment.) Then the king calls forth the three Hebrews Boys (not the divine being!), who are unhurt by the fire.

     This miracle undoubtedly lies in the fact that they “trusted” (rechats; “to be washed”) in God, and surrendered their “bodies” (geshem; “doused with water”) up to Him. (Compare Rom. 12:1) Out of a death-experience comes life and triumph! This is the key for all who do die in the Lord—we will rise again (Dan. 12:1-3), triumphant over death!

-------------------------

--The chapter also list six (6) groups of leaders—or “all” of them; six music instruments—or “all” of them; and, six actions on the part of the king (made, gave, commanded, went near, made, promoted).

--The Revelation of John is built on Daniel’s visions. For example, the “beast” in Revelation 13 is a composite of the creatures in Daniel 7 (in reverse order). Significantly, there are numerous similarities between our story and the beast’s activity in Revelation 13: an emphasis on “worship,” the welding of civil power with religion, the setting of an image, the number 6, forced worship or compliance, and violence.

-- Qerats (“accuse”) literally means to bite/eat. Today, we call someone a “back biter.”  (Balaam, Rev. ???)

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 4

 

When a dream of a great tree is fulfilled, King Nebuchadnezzar comes to acknowledge the God of heaven.  

 

     The opening verses show that through the events in this story King Nebuchadnezzar has to come to know the true God.

     After having a terrible dream, the king called in all the wise men to interpret it for him. But they couldn’t. At last, he called for Daniel, who he now realizes serves a god that is different from, and above, all others.

     In his dream the king saw a great tree that provided for the earth. But two heavenly beings appear and declare that the tree, with a human-like personality, must be cut down to the stump, and wrapped with bronze and iron bands! (The metals have no real value, and, based on the image-dream, show that the tree has come to its end!)  After the trees’ heart is changed from a man’s to a beast’s, it lives like a wild creature for “seven times [iddan]” or years.* All of this is to show that the “most High ruleth” over the kingdoms of men. The king’s image was built on “6”, the decree is based on “7”—the God of heaven has spoken. 

     Daniel is greatly disturbed by the dream, and unable to hide it from the king. As for the tree, “It is thou, O king.” How different this is from his earlier dream, where he was the “head of gold”! The great king, who, because of pride, sought to elevate himself to the status of the “creator,” will soon be debased, living with less than the poorest inhabitants of his kingdom. And yet, the kingdom will not be lost; the stump and roots remain. His kingdom will remain “sure,” until the day he fully recognizes the God of heaven. In closing, Daniel appeals to the king renounce his sins and wickedness, hoping that this might somehow altar God’s word.

     A year later, the dream long behind him, the king looks out over his majestic kingdom and declares “Is this not the great Babylon that I have built?” (Compare Genesis 11, where the people of Shinar-Babylon build a tower to heaven to “make us a name.”) Before he’s finished speaking, a heavenly being pronounces the delayed judgment, stating that the seven years will now begin, and last until he acknowledges the sovereignty of the true God! Immediately, his countenance is changed, and he is driven into the wild for seven years.**      

     At the end of the time prophesied, the king states “I praised the Most High; I honored and glorified him” (NIV). A complete reversal from his earlier statements, the king has repented (which means, “to turn around”), and praises the true “King of heaven!” His sanity suddenly returns, and he is restored to his throne, the seat of authority.

     All of this took place to address the king’s sinful “pride.”

-------------------------

* Iddan means “appointed” or “determined” and is not the typical word for “year.” That a year is meant is further confirmed by the decree was fulfilled exactly one year later, and the use of iddan in 7:25 to represent actual years.

** Ancient cuneiform tablets confirm the event (A.K. Grayson, 1975, British Museum) 

--Intro: self-centered pagan king; his experience; a converted, God-centered king.  The mirror-like A-B-A’, the way Hebrews think (western thought is A-B-C). The central point or theme is found located at the center.

--Nebuchadnezzare, son of the god Marduk

--stories often in 2 stages: 1) world affairs (Ch. 2, metals; Ch. 4, tree); 2) God’s intervention/judgment/kingdom (Ch. 2, stone; Ch 4, tree felled) 

--asar (“band”, KJV) idea of “bound” (NIV), idea of shackled prisoner

--“it may be” reflects opportunity for repentance, and may explain why it’s a whole year before the dream is fulfilled—forgetting the vision, momentarily, his pride re-erupts.

--parallels with the Tower of Babel: both in Shinar (Gen 11:2; Dan. 1:2); both reach to the heavens (Gen 11:4; 4:11); pride of achievement (Gen 11:4; Dan 4:30); and both end with God’s intervention (Gen 11:6, 7; Dan 4:31).

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 5

 

Babylon’s youngest ruler is defiant to the end, until a divine hand-writing brings Babylon to its end!   

 

     Young king Belshazzer, grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, brings Babylon to a new low when he profanes the sacred utensils of the Hebrew temple to praise his gods during a drunken revelry. (The “candlestick” is from the temple.) It’s now wonder that “in the same hour” God responded by revealing a mysterious “hand” and writing on the wall, stop the king in his tracks! So scared he was, he “cried aloud” for his wise men, offering them the position of “third ruler in the kingdom” (his father is Nebuchadnezzar; his deceased grandfather, Nebopolazer) if they can decipher the message! He apparently realized the graveness of the situation. But the situation grows even graver for the king when the wise men can not even make sense of the words, let alone interpret the writing.

     Upon hearing of the matter, the queen (actually, the wife of Nebuchadnezzar) attempts to comfort the young king, informing him about Daniel’s past involvement in the kingdom’s affair, and is certain that “he will shew the interpretation” even now. Daniel is brought before the king and promised a third of the kingdom if he can interpret the mysterious writing.

     Daniel’s first response is to turn down the king’s offer. Perhaps he wanted nothing to do with this rebellious king. Most likely he turned the offer down because he knew, at 83 years of age, that Israel’s 70 years of captivity (Jer. 29:10) was about to end—Babylon is finished!

     Regardless, Daniel agreed to assist the pompous young king, but not before giving him a short history lesson, about his grandfather, King Nebuchadnezzar, whose pride culminated in seven years of insanity before his eventual conversion. Daniel brings it all up to make the point that Belshazzer knew all of this history, yet he persisted in acting defiantly toward his Creator—“in whose hand thy breath is.” For this reason the “hand” was sent.

     First, Daniel reads the four words: “MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN.” Then he interprets their meaning, each followed by a four-word explanantion:*

     MENE [“to count”]; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.”

     TEKEL [“to weigh”]; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting.”

     “PERES [“to break/tear”]; Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.”

     Upon hearing the interpretation, the king declared that Daniel was now the “third ruler” of the kingdom. Imagine! Told the kingdom is finished, yet promotes Daniel to his side! Belshazzar’s actions are defiant, like his grandfather’s, who built the image of pure gold (chapter 3). Belshazzar was slain that very night (539 B.C.), when Darius the Mede** diverted the city’s river and made a surprise entrance under the city’s water-gates.

     Below is the chiastic (“X”) structure of chapter 5, which highlights the mirrored parallels:

          A   The king’s pride (vs 1-4)

               B  The mysterious writing (vs 5-9)

                   C  The queen’s sermon (vs 10-12)

                        D  Belshazzar consults Belteshazzar (vs 13-16)

                   C’  The prophet’s sermon (vs 17-24)

               B’  The mysterious writing deciphered (vs 25-28)

          A’  The king’s fall (vs 29-31)

-------------------------

*The number “4” symbolizes totality and, by extension, the end—there’s no more (Ch. 2 – 4 metal kingdoms; Rev 7:1 – 4 corners of the earth). Babylon has come to an end, on his watch.

** The name Darius is the title of Cyrus’ general, Gobryas. He only reigned for a year (see 9:1).

--(v. 5) same metals, in same order, wood and stone added — Belshazzar will worship anything.

--Nabonidus is Belshazzar’s father; Belshazzar was his regent, exercising authority during the sovereign’s absence.

--v23 “set yourself up” (NIV); Dan 4:37 Nebuch “set up” Yahweh at his conversion, as explained here (5:19, 20).

--“measures of weight”: mina, 600 g.; shekel, 10 g.; ½ mina, 300 g.

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 6

 

Babylon’s last king openly defies the Creator, and receives notice of his end by hand-mail!   

 

     With Darius now on the throne (539 B.C.), Daniel’s peers saw an opportunity to finally do away with this Jew who was “preferred” over them. But Daniel possessed an “excellent spirit,” and they couldn’t find any fault in him. At last, they decided to use Daniel’s finest strength against him—his faithfulness to the “law [dat] of his God.” And so they plotted to destroy him by pitting him against the “law [dat] of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not” As you’ll recall, chapter 3 (the chiastic parallel to chapter 6)* only included Daniel’s three friends; now, Daniel faces a similar battle over worship, but alone.

     The “presidents and princes” approached the king with what appeared to be an excellent idea. They could test the loyalty of everyone in his new kingdom. Knowing that a royal decree is unchangeable, even by the king himself, and that Daniel would never compromise, the Hebrew would walk straight into their snare! As anticipated, their plan moved along perfectly. After the decree went forth, Daniel was observed kneeling at his window as usual. Three times a day, in conjunction with the Temple’s daily sacrifices, he prayed toward Jerusalem, which represented Israel’s hope (see 1 Kings 8:47-49).

     Running back to the king with the news of Daniel’s defiance, the princes began by confirming the law’s unchangeable nature. With that critical detail settled, they proceeded to tell the king what the exile from Judah had done. The king wasn’t dumb; he realized that Daniel had been trapped, and was “displeased with himself.” Though he “set his heart” on delivering Daniel, the day ended without finding a way out of the situation. Standing by the entrance of the lion’s den, the king shouted out “Thy God whom thou servest continually, he will deliver thee!” which expressed his confidence in Israel’s God. Then, as he must, the king affixed his seal to the den’s closure.

     Returning to his palace, they king cleared his rooms of all entertainment (“musicians”) and “spent the night fasting,” which is associated with prayer.** As might be expected, he couldn’t sleep.

     Not waiting for sun up, the king “arose very early” the next morning, and hastened down to the den. Charging his guards to remove the stone closure, the king cries out, “Has your God delivered you from the deadly beasts?” He’s heard about the prophet’s days in Babylon, and he wants to believe that it is all true—and that Daniel is still alive. And he is!

     Removing Daniel from the pit, “no manner of hurt” is found upon him anywhere. Some may have concluded that Daniel was lucky, that the lions were not hungry. But that is not true. Out of righteous anger the king had Daniel’s accusers, along with their wives and children, cast into the den. This time, with no divine protection, the people are immediately destroyed!

     When all was said and done, the king made a decree, “That in every dominion of my kingdom men tremble and fear before the God of Daniel: for he is the living God, and steadfast for ever, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed, and his dominion shall be even unto the end.” As for Daniel, he continued to prosper under Darius, and Cyrus.

-------------------------

* The comparisons between chapters 3 and 6 include:  jealousy as the motivation behind the Chaldean’s actions; an attempt to usurp God’s law with the “law”’ of the state; the Hebrew’s faith is the focus of attack; Babylon’s mechanical religion—a decree, then worship, and if not, death; the Hebrews are “cast into” an earthly tomb (furnace/den); the king personally engages with and speaks to “the dead” Hebrews; a heavenly being intervenes, standing beside the faithful; and, both end with a blessing, a new decree, and the Hebrews prospering.

** “The act of prayer has its roots in the event of Creation. It is the faith that God has the power to transform misery into joy, death into life, nothing into something.” “Pagans pray to what they have made. Bible believers pray to Him who made them.” (Doukhan)

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 7

 

Daniel’s vision of the four world kingdoms, the “little horn” power, the heavenly judgment, and the Son of Man.    

 

     The first half of Daniel was written mostly in Aramaic and contained stories about the Babylonian kings, and their encounters with Israel’s God. The second half, beginning with chapter 8, is written in Hebrew and contains Daniel’s visions. Chapter 7, the “heart” of the book, is situated at the center, and points back and forth; though written in Aramaic, it is Daniel’s first vision.

     Chapter 7 is divided into three scenes, each beginning with “I [Daniel] saw in the night visions” (vs., 2, 7, 13).

* Section 1:  FOUR CREATURES crawl out of the stirring sea

* Section 2:  FOURTH BEAST / LITTLE HORN (includes the “judgment” and heaven’s “books” opened)

* Section 3:  SON OF MAN

* The INTERPRETATION of the vision

Also, using alternating lines of poetry and prose, the author switches back and forth between heaven and earth, revealing a close relationship between God (heaven) and His people (earth).

 

SECTION 1 (verse 2). 

     To begin, Daniel saw in his “vision by night” a wind-swept sea, which represents the masses of the populace around the Mediterranean (middle-East and Europe). This is where the world nations (Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome), represented by the lion, bear, leopard, and beast, rose in prominence. What Nebuchadnezzar saw through a variety of metals (Daniel 2), Daniel now sees through the imagery of blood-thirsty hybrid-creatures. The character and activity of each nation is now detailed: the walls of Babylon were actually adorned with winged-lions; Medo-Persia was a dual-kingdom (Persia rose to supremacy), and it conquered Egypt, Lydia and Babylon; Greece rose up swiftly under the military prowess of Alexander the Great, but fell into the hands of his four generals upon his premature death.    

 

SECTION 2 (verse 7).

     Next Daniel “saw in the night visions” a fourth beast, different from the first three. With “iron teeth” (the fourth metal in the image; 2:31-33), it violently destroys. It represents the Roman Empire, the ruling power in Jesus’ day (see Rev. 13:1-2). The beast has ten horns, but the rise and domination of the “little horn” becomes the primary focus. And just as the metallic statue uniquely ended with clay, so the fourth beasts’ little horn has human features.

     Then the vision suddenly shifts to heaven, where the “books are opened” and God sits in judgment. As a result, the little horn is silenced and the beast destroyed.

 

SECTION 3 (verse 13).

     At last, Daniel sees the “Son of Man” approaching the “Ancient of days” on the “clouds of heaven.” Christ’s kingdom here is the counterpart to the “stone” that crushed the image in Daniel 2 (verses 44, 45). Jesus applied both titles—“Son of Man” and “stone”—to Himself (Luke 20:18; Matt. 24:27). We should note that the Son is approaching the Father’s throne, to receive His dominion and kingdom. This scene will become the background for Christ’s Second Coming to the earth in the New Testament (Mt. 26:64; Rev. 1:7). 

     The Hebrew eye detects three phases in this scene, divided by Daniel’s choice of verbs (action).

          Present tense — The Son of Man was coming. 

          Past tense — The Son had come to the Father, had been brought before Him, and had been given dominion. 

          Future tense — They will worship the Son, whose dominion will last and will not be destroyed.

Thus, the Son of Man’s coming is rooted in His previous participation in the judgment (see Rev. 22:12).        

 

INTERPRETATION (verse 15).

        Having interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s vision of the image (chapter 2), Daniel already knew about the future kingdoms. So why is he “grieved”? No doubt it’s because of the “little horn” power, and the “war” it will wage against God’s people! Daniel’s 70-years of exile in Babylon is about to end. But now he perceives a much longer period of intense persecution that will nearly destroy God’s people, and last until the judgment at the end! So naturally he inquires about the fourth beast and its little horn.

     Like the metals in the image, the four beasts represent “four kings” or kingdoms. But there are ten horns on the fourth beast, which represent ten more kingdoms (“kings”). Historians (including Joseph Mede and Sir Isaac Newton) had long believed that these represented the European powers that sacked Rome (i.e., Franks, Saxons, Lombards).* But the more important question is, Who does the “little horn”—who attacks both God and the saints (verse 25)—represent? If we simply add all the identifying marks together, the answer becomes clear:

* It began small (7:8)

* Originating among the ten, it is another, yet different, kingdom (7:24)

* It manifests itself after the ten, uprooting three of them (7:8)

* It operates on the spiritual level, even usurping God’s truth with its own speech (7:20, 25)

* Acting outside of God’s laws, it becomes a persecuting power (7:21, 25)

* After Rome, it is a dominating power for 1,260** years (7:25)

* It continues until the judgment and Christ’s coming! (7:8-10, 24-26)

     Only one application can be found, and it’s an uncomfortable one for Christians. The “little horn” represents the waywardness of Christ’s Church. As Paul’s New Testament letters and the warnings to the “seven churches” in Revelation demonstrate, the Church had serious problems already in the first century. After the siege of Jerusalem, the Church gained a foothold in Rome (then called “the Holy Roman Church”), and acquired state/civil strength. As it ascended it over-came three nations (the Heruli, Vandals, and Ostrogoths) for their Arian beliefs (Christ is created, and therefore not equal to God). Under Justinian, the Ostrogoths fell about 538 A.D., and the Church ascended to full strength. Compromising with paganism and the world, it began creating its own laws and traditions. Eventually, it grew intolerant of God’s true “saints,” as the Dark Ages of history reveal. Approximately 1,260 years later (1798 A.D.), Pope Pius VI was dethroned by General Napoleon Bonaparte, and the “iron” grip of ecclesiastical authority was immediately replaced by atheism and the “goddess of reason” (in France). The French Revolution changed the face of Europe, and the Church. This understanding has been long understood by Bible scholars and historians (i.e., H. Gratton Guiness, H.C. Leupold, the Reformers, Matthew Henry). Is it any wonder why Daniel’s visions were “sealed till the time of the end”? Like Daniel (who grieved, mourned and fainted under the weight of these end-time visions), God’s people would have been overwhelmed by this foreknowledge.  

     The vision ends with good news, however! In light of the “judgment,” the last earthly powers are destroyed, and Christ’s “everlasting kingdom” is given to “the saints of the most high.” God’s people have overcome and been “vindicated” (TLB) by the “court” of heaven (compare 12:1).

-------------------------

* A popular theory holds that there is a “gap” of time (2000 years, actually!) between the fourth beast and its ten horns. It teaches that ten nations will rise up in Europe at the end of time. We cannot accept this teaching, however, because the text simply does not say this. (Just as the leopard-beast “had” four heads, which represent the four generals who immediately succeeded Alexander the Great, so the fourth creature “had” ten horns.)      

* The symbolic “time [1] and times [2] and the dividing of time [1/2]” is 3 ½ years. The same period of time describes the plight of the Church (Rev. 12:14). The same time period (“forty-two months”) is related to the beast in Rev. 13:5, a time that was still future to John, who lived in the days of the fourth kingdom, Rome. (A comparison of the “little horn” with the beast in Rev. 13 reveals that they are the same power.) The period is also stated as “[1,260] days” (Rev. 11:3). Thus, this time period was future to Daniel and John. A symbolic number, it should be interpreted using the biblical “day for a year” principle (Ezek. 4:6). The 3 ½ years, then are actually 1,260 years, which rightly fits the Dark Ages when Christianity exercised civil power.

--Position on the little horn is not new, but had been the understanding of Bible students for centuries.

--“Actually the Roman Catholic Church was virtually the Christian church in Western Europe for about a thousand years…both Protestants and Catholics may regard it as the embodiment our ‘our’ Christian heritage…” Maxwell, p. 121.

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 8

 

Daniel’s has a vision of a battling ram and he-goat, then more details about the little horn and its attack on the sanctuary.    

 

     With the “first” vision still on his mind (with the four hybrid beast and little horn), Daniel receives another. As this vision opens, he sees a ram with two horns, one higher than the other, come from the east. Like the lop-sided bear, it represents the dual-kingdom of “Media and Persia” (v. 20, 21). Suddenly, a he-goat, with a “notable horn,” flies onto the scene from the west. Like the four-winged leopard, it is a symbol for nation of “Greece” (v. 21). After trampling the ram, the he-goat grows in strength, until its “great horn was broken” (without warfare). It its place four new ones rise up. Following his untimely death, Alexander the Greats’ kingdom was divided among his four generals.

 

LITTLE HORN (verse 9).

     Now enter the “little horn” (from chapter 7*), but with a unique twist. The four horns also grew vertically to “the four winds of heaven,” and the movement is intentional. Daniel explains that out of “one of them”—the four winds, not the four horns—came the little horn. Hebrew words have genders (as does German and Spanish), and the word “horn” is feminine. Thus when Daniel says “out of one of them [masculine] came the little horn,” he means, from one of the four winds.* Coming on the scene in this way, the little horn power is seen to be uniquely distinct from the other world powers, operating on a different plane, just as the little horn did in chapter 7 (it did not grow out of third kingdom or another horn there either.) The little horn comes out of the north* (Ps.48:2), which is associated with the place of God; in the previous vision it sought to usurp God, and in the next vision (Dan. 11) it is called the “king of the north.”      

     So why does this vision proceed directly to the end-time “little horn” power, leaving out Babylon and Rome? And why are these animals “normal,” compared to the beastly hybrids in chapter 7?  It’s because Daniel’s closing visions (chapters 8-12) are directed at Israel, which is why Daniel now reverts back to the Hebrew language. Daniel’s careful choice of words has caused Babylon and Rome to drop from view, highlighting the ceremonially “clean” ram and he-goat. Together, they were specifically associated with the annual Day of Atonement (Lev. 16:5), when the High Priest entered the Most Holy Place of the sanctuary/temple and stood before the Ark of the 10 Commandments to atone for all of Israel’s sins. The themes above—along with judgment, sin (“transgression”), cleansing (tsadaq-Lev. 16:5, 17, 30-34), and restoration—is intended to draw our attention to God’s sanctuary (miqdash, verses 11, 14). In addition to all of this, there is also an allusion to the four horns of the altar and the two cherubim (“holy one”-qadosh) above the Ark. The sanctuary has been at the center of the wars in Daniel from the beginning (1:2; 5:2, 5).

     In chapter 7, the little horn symbolized the rise of the Christian Church, which “grew great” out of the Holy Roman Empire and continued beyond it. But the Church, as history demonstrates, also fell, as it strayed further and further from the pure gospel. In its desire for growth and power, the Church began to compromise with paganism, “Christianizing” unbiblical practices. Further, it began to establish teachings and traditions contrary to Scripture. For example, it instituted an earthly-priesthood, created the confessional, and developed an elaborate system of religious “works.” By these acts of “transgression,” the Church actually diverted man’s attention away from the efficacy of Christ’s (“the Prince of the host”) priestly ministry (Heb. 8:1, 2), thus His “daily [tamid] sacrifice,”* or continuous ministry, in the heavenly “sanctuary was cast down.” So also was His “truth” (emeth)—which is synonymous with His law (Ps. 43:3; 119:43, 44), the Ten Commandments. In addition to venerating idols (Ex. 20:4), the Church adopted as its sign of authority* the pagan “Day of the Sun” as a symbol of worship, an act that was heightened under the Emperor Constantine (circa, 321 A.D.). And so, with the assistance of the state’s strength, the little horn—the Roman Catholic [“universal”] Church—“practiced, and prospered,” welding power at will. Those who did not submit to its dogma and power it persecuted, “cast down…and stamped upon them. This was the beginning of a dark spiritual period, now known as the “Dark Ages.”

 

THE SANCTUARY  (verse 13).

     The terrifying scene ends suddenly when Daniel hears one “holy one” say to another:

 “‘How long will it take for the vision [chazown] to be fulfilled—the vision concerning the daily sacrifice,

the rebellion [transgression] that causes desolation [devastation],

and the surrender of the sanctuary [qodesh] and of the host that will be trampled underfoot?’” (NIV).

     The answer comes back:

“It will take 2,300 evenings and mornings;

then the sanctuary [qodesh] will be reconsecrated [sedaq; “cleansed” (KJV), “restored to its rightful state” (RSV)]”

(NIV).

 

     Given that the little horn power rose up last and continued beyond the fall of Rome, this must be the heavenly “sanctuary” (the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70.), where Christ is ministering as our High Priest. So the question is, how long is 2,300 “evenings and mornings”?

     This phrase is borrowed from Genesis 1 (Creation), and refers to a day. Daniel understood, then, that the spiritual rebellion would last 2300 days. But are these literal or symbolic (a day representing a year) days? If literal, it is about six years; rather minor in comparison to Daniel’s 70 years of captivity. Contemporary scholars argue that the number should be divided (1150 days), and assigned to the brief reign of Antiochus Epiphanes (168-167 B.C.). But his reign, nor his wicked actions, fit those of the little horn. And he certainly didn’t last till the “time of the end.” Because of the vision’s is symbolic, the days should be understood as prophetic years (see Ezek. 4:6). The vision spans 2300 years—although this though would have been incomprehensible to Daniel, we can see its fulfillment from where we stand.

     Now the angel Gabriel appears to explain “the vision [chazown] [that] concerns the time of the end” (NIV), or “the appointed time of the end” (RSV). Building on the little horn’s human/spiritual features from the previous vision, Gabriel explains, “a stern-faced king, a master of intrigue, will arise. He will become very strong, but not by his own power. He will cause astounding devastation and will succeed in whatever he does. He will destroy the mighty men and the holy people. He will cause deceit to prosper, and he will consider himself superior...[he will] take his stand against the Prince of princes. Yet he will be destroyed, but not by human power” (NIV). Clearly, the prophecy is speaking about a power far greater than Antiochus!

     History now confirms the prophecy. Not only did the Church grow in civil strength, but spiritual also. The Church, or its leadership—the Papacy—eventually set its self up as God, claiming to be God’s representative and voice. And with the creation of a new priesthood on earth, and confession to men, it equaled itself to the priestly ministry of the ascended Christ. Like the previous visions revealed (Ch. 2—the stone from heaven; Ch. 7—the judgment in heaven), this power will come to a supernatural end when Christ sets up His kingdom. 

     At the close Gabriel tells Daniel once again that the “The vision (mareh)…is true, but seal up the vision (chazown), for it concerns the distant future.” (NIV)  (EXPLAIN)

 

DANIEL’S REACTION (verse 27)

     The vision and encounter left Daniel exhausted and ill. Daniel was overwhelmed by the intensity of the little horn’s activity upon the Prince, His sanctuary and His people. “I was appalled by the vision,” he wrote, “It was beyond understanding [bin](NIV). Imagine learning today that the rebellion on earth will grow far worse and last 2,300 years more! Who could endure such a thought?

     But there remains yet another question: what is the starting point of the vision? Already Daniel knows that two more kingdoms must rise up (Greece and Rome) before the little horn even comes on the scene! Daniel is left without sufficient “understanding.” 

-------------------------

* The little horn. is “undoubtedly” the same as Chap. 7: Daniel would have used another symbol for a new power; the fact that this power alone is the same points to the necessity to recognize it; the same “arrogance and intelligence” (v 23, 25); “attempts to usurp God”; “persecutes the saints”; “succeeds the reign of the beasts and remains to the end”.

--V. 8 “the four winds [fem.] of heaven [masc.]; v.9 “out of one [fem.] of them [masc.]

* North.: Also, God’s servant Cyrus, the messiah to Israel (Isa. 41:25). However, Israel’s key enemies (i.e., Babylon) also come from the north (Jer. 4:6; 50:30; Isa. 14:13, 14), the entry into Palestine. Satan, who is personified by Babylon, aspired to be like God (Isa. 14:13). The little horn power is called the “king of the north” in Daniel 11, the chiastic parallel to Daniel 8.  

*The word “daily” (tamid) means continual. Thus, the use of words like “sacrifice” or “burnt offering” in some translations is assumed, since there were many features in the sanctuary that were continual (i.e., burning candlestick, bread, incense).

* Catholicism’s claims. “…practice and tradition had consecrated the Sunday to the public worship of God by the hearing of Mass and resting from work.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, “Sunday,” Vol. 14, p. 335.) “By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of…Because by [Protestants] keeping Sunday, they acknowledge the Church’s power…” (An Abridgement of the Christian Doctrines, Rev. Henry Tuberville, Excelsior Catholic Publ. House).

--In light of all the heavy sanctuary imagery (including the sanctuary, atonement animals, sin, and the high priest [sar; v. 11, 25; Ezra 8:24]), the “daily” is probably the sacrifice that burned perpetually on the altar, “symbolizing God’s faithful presence.” “…we derive our authority for [Sunday observance]…from a living teacher, and that teacher is the [Catholic] Church…” (Clifton Tracts, Vol. 3, p. 8; Tracts on Christian Doctrine, “Why don’t you keep holy the Sabbath-day?).

--The daily could be a reference to either “the long continuance of Satan’s opposition to the work of Christ through the medium of paganism” or “the continual priestly ministry of Christ in the heavenly sanctuary.” Either way, Rome—pagan and papal—“opposed true worship, whether by imposing the worship of the emperor [paganism] or by setting up practices and teaching doctrines that the Scriptures do not sanction [countering Christ’s priestly ministry].” (Keogh) Either way, the daily refers to “true worship.” (Maxwell)

 

Notes: judgment (ch 7) / cleansing (ch 8); Ch. 7-Day of Judgment / Ch. 8-Day of Atonement (the Jew assoc. the day with judgment); the Septuagint (LXX), Greek translation of the OT, uses “katharisai” (to purify), used inconnection with Kippur (Lev. 16:30).

Notes: Day of Atonement: totality of Israel and sanctuary purified (Lev. 16:17, 33, 34); only time high priest entered the Holy of Holies in the sanctuary; sin wasn’t only forgiven, but banished from the camp.

“Daniel sees a heavenly kippur.”

**the hope of re-creation can only be found in the Creator;  judgment & creation combined in Rev 14:7

 

 

 

 

DANIEL 9

 

Daniel’s prayer; a Messianic prophecy.    

 

DANIEL’S PRAYER

     Daniel 9 is set in the first year of Darius the Mede (538 B.C.), a year after Babylon’s fall. Daniel had been studying the sacred writings of Jeremiah (Jer. 25:11), and he “understood” (bin) that 68 of Israel’s 70 years captivity, and the subsequent “desolation” of Jerusalem, was about to end. However, the previous vision-mareh—the little horn’s 2300-day reign and attack on God’s sanctuary—left Daniel without “understanding” (bin; see 8:27). He is concerned about Israel’s past failures, perhaps her present attitude towards God, and maybe the fact that he does not see any changes at the “top” regarding Israel’s return to Jerusalem (a “delay,” v. 19). As if Israel’s intercessor, Daniel earnestly entreats the Lord through “prayer and supplication, with fasting, and sackcloth, and ashes,” signs of humility, repentance and even death. (It is Daniel’s character that stands out in Scripture!)

    Daniel’s prayer—the seventh, last and longest in the book—is a prayer of confession, wherein he selflessly identifies himself completely with Israel.* God’s people had not obeyed and kept God’s “covenant” or “laws.” She had turned His “servants the prophets” away. She had “sinned…committed iniquity…done wickedly…[and] rebelled.” Her “trespasses” resulted in “confusion of faces” (“covered with shame,” NIV). Daniel confesses “We obeyed not…we have sinned, we have done wickedly…our sins, and…iniquities…[and for this reason] the curse is poured upon us…the oath that is written in the law of Moses.” Indeed, the Lord had “confirmed his words…by bringing upon us a great evil…under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem.” And yet, all of this has occurred in order that “we might turn from our iniquities, and understand thy truth.” But ultimately, Daniel is concerned about God’s character, and the reputation of His holy city: “Jerusalem and thy people are become a reproach to all that are about us…the city which is called by thy name.

     Daniel’s prayer closes with an earnest appeal for God’s sanctuary, city, and people: “Hear the prayer of thy servant…Cause thy face to shine upon thy sanctuary [miqdash; 8:11] that is desolate…O Lord, hear; O Lord, forgive; O Lord, hearken and do; defer [delay] not, for thine own sake, O my God: for thy city…and thy people…[who are] “called by thy name.”

 

GABRIEL RETURNS (verse 20)

     “While I was speaking and praying, confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel and making my request to the Lord my God for his holy hill [Jerusalem/temple]—while I was still in prayer, Gabriel, the man I had seen in the earlier vision [see 8:16], came to me in swift flight about the time of the evening sacrifice [minchah; v.27]. "Daniel, I have now come to give you insight and understanding [bin]. As soon as you began to pray, an answer was given, which I have come to tell you, for you are highly esteemed [“greatly beloved,” KJV]. Therefore, consider [bin] the message [dabar; see 8:13-14] and understand [bin] the vision [mareh; 8:26]” (NIV).

     Gabriel (8:16) has returned to give Daniel understanding-bin regarding the earlier vision-mareh of the 2300 days. Thus, the 70-week prophecy below is a follow-up to the 2300-day prophecy.

 

70 WEEKS & THE MESSIAH (verse 24)

24)  “Seventy weeks are determined [“Seventy 'sevens' are decreed” NIV]  upon thy people and upon thy holy city,

to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation [“atone” NIV] for iniquity,

and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.”

 

     Until recently, the Church held that this prophecy pointed to Jesus Christ, God’s anointed Messiah. But contemporary scholars now argue that the subject is the Antichrist! We’ll patiently study this passage for ourselves.    

     70 Weeks. Daniel prayed for Jerusalem, which lay desolate for 70 years. But God’s response goes beyond the city, and takes in the entire world. The 70-years is elevated to 7 times 70!  At the end of the 70-year exile came Cyrus, a messiah to the Jewish nation. But Daniel now learns that at the end of 70 weeks (7x7x10) God will bring a final and universal Messiah. Only Jesus, the Christ (meaning “anointed”) could meet all six specifications of this prophecy.

 

     Thus, Christ’s ministry in the heavenly sanctuary is of far greater concern than the establishment of the earthly temple.

 

 

     Weeks. The “weeks” are prophetic in nature: a day represents a year. The “seventy weeks,” or 490 days, represent 490 prophetic years. The first phrase “seventy years” (v. 2, 3) is written normal, but second “weeks seventy” (v. 24) is intentionally backwards. Aware of this,* both Jewish and Christians traditions have interpreted the latter as “weeks of years.” The day-year principle is used elsewhere in Scripture (Num. 14:34: Ezek. 4:5).

     Messiah’s mission. xxxxxx         

    

25a)  “Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment [“issuing of the decree” NIV]

to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince [“Anointed One, the ruler” NIV]

 

26b) shall be seven [7] weeks, and threescore and two [62] weeks:

the street shall be built again, and the wall [“trench” NIV], even in troublous times.”

 

     Commandment. As predicted, Artaxerxes’ decree in 457 B.C. (Ezra 6:14; 7:12-26) gave the returning exiles full rights to rebuild their city and temple, and administer their own nation. The starting point for the 70-week prophecy (490 years) would be 457 B.C.

     Divisions. The vision’s time-frame is divided into three parts. After 7 and 62 weeks—69 weeks (483 years)—would extend to the “Messiah the Prince.” One week, or 7 years, still remained.

     Messiah. The Hebrew word mashiyach (messiah) means “anointed,” which is translated “Christ” in Greek (Matt. 16:16; Luke 3:15). Moving forward 483 years from 457 B.C. takes us to A.D. 27, the very year when Christ was anointed (baptism) for His 3 ½ years of ministry!

     Messiah / City. The Hebrew reader notices a poetic rhythm in verses 25-27, which has been maintained in our modern division of the verses. Guided by the Hebrew language, verses 25a, 26a and 27a all begin with a focus on the Messiah-mashiyach; the last half of each verse (‘b’) focuses on the city-hrs, Jerusalem. 

 

26a)  “And after threescore and two [62] weeks shall Messiah [“the Anointed One” NIV] be cut off,

but not for himself [lit., “no one for him”]:

 

26b) and the people of the prince [“ruler” NIV] that shall come

shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;

and the end thereof shall be with a flood,

and unto the end of the war desolations are determined

[“War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.” NIV]”

 

     Christ’s ministry would be “cut off” by His sacrificial death. 

 

          27a)  “And he shall confirm the covenant with many [rab] for one week [“one ‘seven’” NIV]:

and in the midst [“middle” NIV] of the week [“’seven’” NIV] he shall cause

the sacrifice and the oblation [“offering” NIV] to cease,

 

27b) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation,

          and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate [“And on a wing [[of the temple]] he will set up an abomination

that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.” NIV].”

 

 

 

 

 

-------------------------

 

- bin – used with 70 years and 70 weeks

*  The prayer is chiastically structured:  A - “we have been wicked” (v. 5,6);  B – “all Israel” (vs 7, 8) ;  A’ – “we have not obeyed” (v 10, 11)

-  The name Yahweh, the God of the covenant, never before used, is mentioned seven times.

* Cyrus (538; Ezra 2:65)—return of the first exiles; Darius Hystaspes (519; Ezra 6:3-12)—confirmed the first; Artaxerxes-Longimanus (fall of 457 B.C.; Ezra 7:13-26)—the last, described in the singular, most thorough—temple and political (v.25), and mentions God’s intervention (“praise be to the Lord…has put it into the king’s heart…”).

* Compare 10:2, properly written (literally) “three weeks of days.”

 

 

Isa  47:1  “virgin daughter”-who?;  v.6-7 Who-“I will continue forever”;  Isa 13:17  “I will stir up the Medes against them”; v. 19 “Babylon will be overthrown.”;  Isa 44:28  ref to Cyrus

captive 605 B.C.; Jerusalem fell 597, destruction 586.

Cyrus is now ruler. He was God’s “annointed” (Messiah) one for Israel. (Isa. 44:28-45:4; 2 Chron. 36:18-13)

 

Messiah 'anointed' Jn 1:41, Acts 10:38

 

 

 

 

 

James L. Merrills, M. Div.

Comments and questions can be directed to: e-mail: magic@mr-jim.com

 

 

 

     Here’s a brief summary :

·        E.

·        S.    

 

     First seal.

 

Ch 7  thrones cast-remah – God’s respsonse to king cast (ch 3, 6)

     law” – civil/state laws already seen in Ch. 3, 6

Gun-Wielding Woman

 

 

 

The Deeper, Personal Message of Daniel 7&8

     G. Pfandl writes, “The primary purpose of the investigative judgment is…the vindication of God’s people”; that is, “judgment was given to the saints” (7:22). But I ask, what are the saints “vindicated” of, and what exactly is the “judgment” that vindicates them? Let’s take a closer look at what is at stake in Daniel 7 and 8.

     We have seen how the “daily [sacrifice of Christ’s priestly ministry in heaven was] taken away” (8:11) by the little horn power through the creation of an earthly-priesthood, a new system of salvation-by-works, an earthly confessional for man, and more. And yet, it would appear that Satan’s attack (through the little horn) on the saints and the heavenly sanctuary is about something greater and far more personal than just skewing man’s understanding of Christ’s priestly ministry in heaven.

     Fast-forward to Revelation 12:10. Were told that “the accuser [that is, the “Devil”—the driving force behind the earthly beast (13:1, 2)] of our brethren…keeps bringing before our God charges against them” (AMP). The word “accuser” (kategoros) means “against one in the assembly, like a complainant at law.” Satan’s accusations against God’s people are on a judicial level. We have transgressed God’s Law. However, the sins of the repentant—as illustrated through the O.T. sanctuary—are symbolically transferred to Christ the Lamb in the heavenly sanctuary, where God’s law resides in the heavenly ark (Rev. 11:19).

     Return to Daniel 7. Now then, our “accuser” has a legal case us against us. Like him, we have rebelled against God’s government and transgressed His holy law. Since we have sinned, we are deserving of eternal death, like him! Thus, Satan challenges God’s willingness to forgive us, before the entire universe! God’s character is on the line!

     The “books” (v.10)—the records of the saint’s past actions—are opened before God, the righteous Judge. Then, Christ, our High Priest—who is “always living to make petition to God and intercede with Him and intervene for [the saints]” (Heb. 7:25, AMP)—is brought “before Him,” as our advocate or lawyer. “My blood, Father!” the Lamb (Rev. 5:6) pleads, “My blood was shed to cover the sinner’s repented sin! Through my sacrifice I have paid the penalty for their sin in full, to redeem them from the bondage of sin, and the grip of eternal death!” Accepting man’s Substitute, the heavenly court pronounces “judgment in favor of the saints” (7:22; NIV). Pardon is now written opposite their name in the books. The judgment process complete, the verdict “for the saints” (RSV) is also a sentence against their accuser. All sin is (symbolically) transferred from the sanctuary to him. The sanctuary is now tsadaq: “cleansed” (KJV) and “restored to its rightful state” (RSV; “declared right,” YLT). The Kingdom of heaven is handed over to the redeemed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




(P


Or



M


L


J
Y!


S


Or, email: magic@mr-jim.com


Last updated: Jan. 2, 2009
Copyright 1996.2008 by mr-jim.com